What makes schools succeed? We typically measure the success of a school through
standardized tests and graduation rates.
These measures help the community at large determine whether a school is
successful or not, but what helps a school succeed? I’m sure many would argue that schools succeed because of
time spent in the classroom and the quality of the teacher, among other
things. I don’t deny that these
factors are important, but I believe that schools could be even more successful
if they had more autonomy, if there was more collaboration and cooperation
among and between teachers and students, and if the school had a culture and
climate that focused on students.
If every school had autonomy to make their own decisions,
and had strong leadership to make good decisions, I believe our schools would
be much more successful. For seven
years I taught in a school that had autonomy. We were able to make all our own financial and curricular
decisions. We thought about the
current student body, and made decisions based on what our students
needed. We didn’t have to use
textbooks and we didn’t have to do what every other school around us was
doing. We developed our own
curricula to meet the needs of our students, and our students were
successful. Success can be seen as
evidenced by test scores (http://arch.k12.hi.us/PDFs/ssir/2011/charter/SSIR149-C.pdf)
and I believe the progress we made as a school was because of the local power the
school had.
I take this experience and compare it to my current position. I work in a traditional school district
where the superintendent or other district administrators must approve almost
all curricular changes that teachers want to make prior to changes being made. Even my principal lacks power to make
certain changes. Schools aren’t
allowed to decide what materials are best to meet their students’ needs, the
decision needs to be based on what’s best for the district, even if the needs
of the school are different. My
school is currently labeled as a focus school, a new label in Michigan as part
of NCLB. Even though we need to
make changes to help our lower achievers be more successful, we have so many
hoops to jump through that I’m not sure if/when changes will be made. If we had autonomy to make our own
decisions, we might be able to reach more of our students. Autonomy is so important that an entire
section of this paper
has been devoted to it. After
looking at many different schools and examining different factors, the authors
find that schools with autonomy tend to perform better than schools that don’t
have autonomy. Giving autonomy to schools allows
schools to develop and assess students on their curricula and make appropriate
adjustments so that students succeed.
Meier (2002) and his staff believe in autonomy so much that they recommend
“Decisions about curriculum, pedagogy, and scheduling … be made by on-site
professionals” (p. 65). This needs
to become a common practice in our schools.
Eisner (2001) argues that if we want our students to be
successful, we need to teach them how to have quality conversations. Since conversing is a skill that is
needed in almost all aspects of a person’s life, we need to teach students how
to talk with one another. When
students are able to talk about issues, both curricular and non-curricular,
they build their critical thinking skills (Eisner, 2001). When we teach our students how to have
discussions (like in this lesson plan on
literature circles) we give them conversational strategies, teach them how to
relate to others, and how to organize their thoughts. If students can articulate their thoughts verbally, they
will also have an easier time writing down their thoughts and they will be able
to process more difficult material.
Conversations are also important when thinking about teachers. Teachers need to have
opportunities to talk with one another- about students, lessons, and everyday
school business. If teachers have
built in collaboration time, when they can discuss curricular issues, schools are
more likely to end up with an aligned curriculum. Schools will likely be more successful if teachers have time
to visit each other’s classrooms, talk about and reflect on teaching styles,
and provide each other with feedback and support (Meier, 2002). Our students will be more successful
when teachers have opportunities to collaborate and improve their
instruction.
Lastly, and probably most importantly, schools will succeed
when they have a positive culture and climate. Schools need to be small with small class sizes so that teachers
have the opportunity to know their students well- academically and personally
(Meier, 2002). When a school has a strong and positive culture, students can
surpass many expectations. Baruti
Kafele is a principal in New Jersey who has turned around a poor performing high
school. He has established high
expectations along with respect for and knowledge of all of his students. When students feel cared for and
acknowledged they are willing to rise to high expectations. This video provides a glimpse
at how Kafele has shaped the culture of his school. In the book Transforming School Culture, (Muhammad, 2009) school culture is
described as “the set of norms, values, and beliefs, rituals and ceremonies,
symbols and stories that make up the ‘persona’ of a school” (p. 12). Schools that have a strong culture and communicate
the expectations, values, and beliefs to students are more likely to see their
students succeed. Students know
when they are cared about and when their teachers are looking out for their
best interest. If the school can
support each student, then students will push themselves to meet the
expectations because they know they won’t be working on their own.
If schools had the ability to make
autonomous decisions, worked to build collaboration with students and teachers,
and established a school culture that encouraged and supported students, our
schools would be successful. While
we may have to measure success based on test scores, that shouldn’t be our only
measuring stick. If schools can
work together to provide students with the skills they need as individuals and
provide all of the support needed for students to achieve, then we have truly
helped our students succeed. The success
of schools needs to be measured not only by test scores, but also on how
schools work together internally to support their students.
References:
Eisner, E.
(2001). What does it mean
to say a school is doing well? Phi Delta Kappan,
82 (5): 367-372.
Meier, D.
(2002). Chapter 3. The
Power of their Ideas: Lessons for
America from a
Small
School in Harlem. Boston, MA:
Beacon Press
Muhammad, A.
(2009). Transforming School Culture: How to Overcome Staff
Division. Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree Press.
A pretty compelling list of ingredients for schools success here; teacher autonomy, skills focused instruction, a caring school climate. You suggest at the end that we may have to measure school success partly based on test scores. Is that just deference to the current regime or do you think that testing has some role from within your list of ingredients. Here's one possibility: In its way, testing can express care by being a part of maintaining high academic standards. Would you agree to that? While no care theorist I know of openly claims that high academic standards are unimportant, I get the sense that high academic standards are relatively unimportant for some.
ReplyDelete